|
Post by chandelier on Jun 20, 2014 4:52:36 GMT
I worry that voting for the first person who voted during the previous day will lead to a chilling effect on future voting. I will vote for Gamerdog6482, for bandwagoning without much of an explanation as to why. I do find being so confident about a hunch and protesting so much about having 100% accuracy only to be wrong kind of suspicious, but I'm not convinced yet that it's a sign of being mafia. No vote for now.
|
|
TSM
5000+
Ableist Kinkshamer
Posts: 5,195
|
Post by TSM on Jun 20, 2014 5:13:09 GMT
Imma vote for herpes because honestly we nearly lynched an innocent and beardknife just about died. so yeah.
also breadknife your name is beardknife now
|
|
Breadknife
1500+
One confusion tends to be its direct inspiration.
Posts: 1,888
|
Post by Breadknife on Jun 20, 2014 5:29:50 GMT
also breadknife your name is beardknife now Charming...
|
|
|
Post by jello on Jun 20, 2014 6:28:55 GMT
Imma vote for herpes because honestly we nearly lynched an innocent and beardknife just about died. so yeah. also breadknife your name is beardknife now An innocent was lynched. Breadknife was almost killed by the mafia, but was resurrected by someone.
|
|
TSM
5000+
Ableist Kinkshamer
Posts: 5,195
|
Post by TSM on Jun 20, 2014 6:57:58 GMT
Imma vote for herpes because honestly we nearly lynched an innocent and beardknife just about died. so yeah. also breadknife your name is beardknife now An innocent was lynched. Breadknife was almost killed by the mafia, but was resurrected by someone. I meant to stress the and more than I had. We almost lost two people is what I meant to say.
|
|
|
Post by jello on Jun 20, 2014 7:18:03 GMT
Oh, okay. I thought you were confused as to what happened. Sorry.
|
|
Gamerdog
2000+
Benomia/Bezombia from NS
Posts: 2,209
|
Post by Gamerdog on Jun 20, 2014 11:16:15 GMT
I worry that voting for the first person who voted during the previous day will lead to a chilling effect on future voting. I will vote for Gamerdog6482, for bandwagoning without much of an explanation as to why. While I honestly can't blame you, if Herpes and I were both mafia (he starting the bandwagon and me continuing it), why would I vote to lynch him?
|
|
Дьяково
6250+
Weird, but acceptable
Posts: 6,688
|
Post by Дьяково on Jun 20, 2014 11:26:00 GMT
I worry that voting for the first person who voted during the previous day will lead to a chilling effect on future voting. I will vote for Gamerdog6482, for bandwagoning without much of an explanation as to why. While I honestly can't blame you, if Herpes and I were both mafia (he starting the bandwagon and me continuing it), why would I vote to lynch him? And if he's innocent, Why hasn't he been here defending his accidentally (assuming his innocence for the moment) getting a fellow townie lynched?
|
|
|
Post by Serrland on Jun 20, 2014 16:57:21 GMT
I worry that voting for the first person who voted during the previous day will lead to a chilling effect on future voting. I will vote for Gamerdog6482, for bandwagoning without much of an explanation as to why. I do find being so confident about a hunch and protesting so much about having 100% accuracy only to be wrong kind of suspicious, but I'm not convinced yet that it's a sign of being mafia. No vote for now. Yeah, it's not quite enough evidence to convince me he's mafia. Suspicious, but not clear enough for me to risk a vote to lynch him. I'm going to hold off on voting for the time being.
|
|
|
Post by jello on Jun 20, 2014 18:11:07 GMT
I worry that voting for the first person who voted during the previous day will lead to a chilling effect on future voting. I will vote for Gamerdog6482, for bandwagoning without much of an explanation as to why. While I honestly can't blame you, if Herpes and I were both mafia (he starting the bandwagon and me continuing it), why would I vote to lynch him? I didn't say I thought you were both mafia.
|
|
Indigo
4000+
Mistress of Spam
Posts: 4,485
|
Post by Indigo on Jun 20, 2014 19:01:19 GMT
So I was requested to help interpret some signs. *reads motions from @eldichbury as he signals and whatnot* Hmmm, okay, this is what I'm getting: Message for whereyouthinkyoupoliying from panicberry. Message reads as follows: All I do is interpret what I hear guys. /character
|
|
|
Post by The Beautiful Darkness on Jun 20, 2014 19:16:46 GMT
Ok, this is bullshit.
|
|
Indigo
4000+
Mistress of Spam
Posts: 4,485
|
Post by Indigo on Jun 20, 2014 19:19:45 GMT
*shrug* They said that they were rules lawyering too. Sorry about that.
|
|
|
Post by The Beautiful Darkness on Jun 20, 2014 19:27:17 GMT
Suddenly, you see a pink cloud approaching in the distance. As it gets closer, you discern what appears to be a pack of cards approaching you. At it's head is a super irate looking woman. You fall to the ground as you recognise the Queen of Hearts. "Orf with 'is head!!" she screeches, pointing at Herpes. The card soldiers grab the protesting Herpes and use one of their own to give him the ultimate paper cut. Herpes is dead, and lynch votes are reset. The new round of voting starts now and goes for the next 48 hours.
Guys, as you might guess, I don't like to god mod as a rule. When I have evidence that Elderberry is not only forwarding his role but is also doing everything he can to circumvent a handicap particular to him, I consider my hand forced.
|
|
|
Post by The Beautiful Darkness on Jun 20, 2014 19:29:01 GMT
*shrug* They said that they were rules lawyering too. Sorry about that. You're not the first person I've heard stuff like this from, so I'm not holding you responsible.
People. This is a game. Please remember.
|
|
|
Post by The Beautiful Darkness on Jun 20, 2014 19:30:22 GMT
For those of you who don't already know, Elderberry was the frog prince, an innocent.
|
|
Дьяково
6250+
Weird, but acceptable
Posts: 6,688
|
Post by Дьяково on Jun 20, 2014 19:42:09 GMT
Well, the person I was suspicious of turned out to be an innocent, so I really don't have anything to go with other than restarting the voting by voting for the last person to receive a vote... While jello's argument wasn't super compelling, I don't see any flaws in his logic either... Tentative vote for GamerDog…
|
|
Gamerdog
2000+
Benomia/Bezombia from NS
Posts: 2,209
|
Post by Gamerdog on Jun 20, 2014 21:01:34 GMT
I'm still trying to figure out exactly what just happened ;-; So if Herpes was innocent...well...fuck, that makes me look bad doesn't it.
If anything, that just tells me that nobody actually has any idea what's going on. Me included. I'm half-tempted to vote angry russian because he voted for me but honestly at this point I can see why people would think I'm mafia, considering apparently I voted for two innocents <.<
But, if Herpes was innocent (and obviously I'm innocent) then that means that the first-day bandwagon against Nap WAS just random. Because there was no other consensus at all I have to conclude that the actual mafia abstained on the first day - a good tactic, ended up turning half the town against three innocents.
And, of course, that train leads me to the even larger first-day bandwagon of people who didn't vote. Among those people:
-Serrland -Breadknife -Hurdegayrp
How many Mafia are there on average? Last game there were five, which means it's likely that there's a similar number to start with. It's possible that some of the mafia didn't follow the no-vote bandwagon, and some didn't vote, but this seems like a decent list to start with.
Of course, I also could be completely wrong and just posted the list of remaining innocents, but there's only one way to tell, right? RIGHT?
Vote for Serrland for now.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 20, 2014 21:08:05 GMT
I'm incredibly confused and will abstain from voting again.
|
|
TSM
5000+
Ableist Kinkshamer
Posts: 5,195
|
Post by TSM on Jun 20, 2014 21:13:42 GMT
I'll go with Gamerdog for now, but if he's innocent I'd start looking into dya
|
|
Oviraptor
3000+
I smell like cabbage..
Did someone say space?
Posts: 3,693
|
Post by Oviraptor on Jun 20, 2014 21:33:17 GMT
I'm incredibly confused and will abstain from voting again. Ditto. I may vote before time is up but for now I need to think.
|
|
Breadknife
1500+
One confusion tends to be its direct inspiration.
Posts: 1,888
|
Post by Breadknife on Jun 20, 2014 22:07:23 GMT
I've got a couple of suspicious people in mind, but it's only suspicions, based upon what has/hasn't been said. Not enough to vote, right now, but if anyone cares to dig themselves into a deeper hole, feel free. I would appreciated it, cheers.
|
|
Hurdegaryp
2000+
Under the Radar
Hell Is Where The Heart Is
Posts: 2,479
|
Post by Hurdegaryp on Jun 20, 2014 22:52:05 GMT
I'm incredibly confused and will abstain from voting again. We need more data, data that is currently not available. The only people who can currently vote with confidence are Mafia members and those with special skills. Also keep in mind that Mafia members may vote for other Mafia members every now and then to confuse the innocent, sometimes even deliberately sacrificing one of their own ranks in order to simplify the chain of command.
|
|
|
Post by jello on Jun 21, 2014 1:41:05 GMT
With the voting reset, does that mean we have 48 hours from the point where it was reset?
|
|
|
Post by The Beautiful Darkness on Jun 21, 2014 2:21:28 GMT
That's correct.
|
|
Gamerdog
2000+
Benomia/Bezombia from NS
Posts: 2,209
|
Post by Gamerdog on Jun 21, 2014 3:21:52 GMT
Well when I'm lynched and y'all realize that I was innocent the whole time, you'll know who to look at. I suppose that even if I have to die for the innocents to win, it's still worth it in the end.
|
|
|
Post by whereyouthinkyoupoliying on Jun 21, 2014 8:28:12 GMT
... I go away for a day and this is what happens?
|
|
|
Post by whereyouthinkyoupoliying on Jun 21, 2014 8:39:40 GMT
Alright then.
I'm very much sticking with my vote for Angry Russians.
I have one other candidate on my "yeah, you're suspicious" list. Should the general voting happen to end up split between that person and someone else, and barring any other developments until then, I'll switch my vote to that person.
|
|
|
Post by jello on Jun 21, 2014 10:09:36 GMT
I'm only familiar with Дьяково 's playing style from this game and the last game. I felt like he had a suspicious style last game and ended up being right. He's doing similar things now. Could any of you who are more familiar with him tell me if his style is different in these past two games than before? It could be that he just has a style of playing that I find to be suspicious and don't want to be perpetually suspicious of him.
|
|
|
Post by desperatemarlas on Jun 21, 2014 12:55:48 GMT
Angry Russians are always suspicious. It's their thing.
I'm not sure who to vote for yet, though.
|
|